| PAST AGE
The 'V' sign and Crossed
Fingers. If you cross the first and second fingers of your
right hand in England it is a sign of good luck. Take those same
fingers, but part them in the shape of a 'V', and it will be seen as a
very bad insult. Both these signs are still in use today and have the
same origins - back in the early 1400's! Both of these gestures started in the 'Hundred Years War'
between France and England (1337-1457) - and were born out of the
devastating effect the English Lonwbow had in battle against the French.
At
the battle of Agincourt in
1415, for example, 1,000 arrows were fired every second. After the
battle, observers wrote that the white feathers from the flights were
so thick on the ground, it looked like snow.

The
longbows were drawn using the first and second fingers of the right
hand. And so feared were the English Longbowmen that, when captured,
the French would cut those two fingers off to render the bowman useless
should he escape. When the
English archers held up those fingers upright and apart to taunt the
French before a battle they were actually saying "See!
I still have them!" and the "V" sign rapidly became
a very insulting gesture. On the
other hand, the "crossed fingers" was a sign of hope and good luck
exchanged between Englishmen before a battle, meaning that these
fingers and, therefore, they themselves would survive.
 The Hundred Years War
1337-1457;
series of conflicts, spanning more than 100 years, between England and
France. Edward III of England, claimed that he was the legal heir to
the French throne through his mother, Isabella, sister to King Charles
IV of France, who had died in 1328. The French, however, said that the
crown could not descend through the female line and gave the throne to
Philip VI, cousin to the deceased king.
Agincourt
Sources
widely vary as to the size of the French army. Some put the lowest
estimates as 30,000 men and some put them as high as 150,000 men. In
reality the lowest estimate is probably closer to the truth. King Henry
V had initially tried to avoid a battle by offering to return Harfleur
and all the prisoners that the English had taken. The French replied
agreeing to this but in addition they demanded that he must renounce
his claim to the French throne in order to leave France without
fighting. This Henry refused to do and the battle was an inevitable
consequence. The French were extremely confident of victory because of
their enormous numerical superiority. Records show that the soldiers
spent the night before the battle singing and taunting the English
across the lines who were within earshot. One account even mentioned
that the French were betting on how many captives they would take.
However,
the English had a number of things in their favour that the French had
ignored. Unlike many armies of the time, Henry V had planned this
expedition very carefully and his army was unlike many of those of the
times. Throughout Europe it was normal practice for an army to be made
up of Commoners (normal people) supplied by the local landowner as part
of his feudal dues.- In contrast, Henry’s army was specially recruited,
his men were well paid, well trained and extremely disciplined. Much of
his army comprised of expert archers who were professionals and well
practiced with the English longbow. One key factor was that King Henry
V was a truly charismatic commander and was popular with his men.
Unlike many kings Henry was able to motivate his troops. One of the
most famous speeches in Shakespeare’s plays is Henry’s actual address
to his men prior to the battle. Some of the real
conversation from people who took part in the battle has been passed
down to us. One commander, Sir Walter Hungerford, said on the eve of
the battle “they had not but one ten thousand of those men in
England who do no work today”. Henry replied, “Wot
you not that the Lord with these few can overthrow the pride of the
French?” Shakespeare’s version of this sentiment is more
elegant:
If we are marked to die, we are enough, To
do our country loss; and if to live, The fewer men, the
greater share of honor.
The French Army The
French had a far superior force in numbers but they lacked the English
training, discipline and organisation. They became overconfident
thinking that as they outnumbered the English by so much that they
would easily win. The French king, Charles VI, was both weak and
mentally ill. As such he was unfit to lead his army so it was delegated
to Charles D’Albert who was the Constable of France and also to
Boucicault, the Marshal. Even though they were both experienced
soldiers, capable of commanding the army effectively, they were looked
upon with scorn by the French knights (and nobles). It was seen that
the two commanders were not of high enough a social rank to command
knights and so many orders were ignored on purpose. This was a fatal
flaw for the French and led to the slaughter of their forces.
The Battlefield The
French army had chosen the worst place to fight. Near to Agincourt the
road to Calais passed between two thick forests not quite a mile apart
at the French end and narrowing towards the English end. This was not
the best place for a French attack as they could not move round the
side of the English to outflank them. Furthermore, as they advanced on
the English, the trees would force them closer and closer together.
Henry arranged his troops carefully with his archers taking up
positions on the flanks and between the men-at-arms. Despite the French
having the advantage in numbers they refused to start the attack. At
about 11 o’clock on St. Crispin’s Day, Henry became tired of waiting
and he gave the order “In the name of God Almighty and of Saint George,
Avount Banner in the best of the year, and Saint George this day be
thine help”. The English replied with loud cries of "Hurrah! Hurrah!
Saint George and Merrie England” and they advanced to within 300 yards
of the French lines. Following their commanders' orders the English
halted and planted lines of angled sharpened stakes whilst the French
watched. These stakes were to break up any cavalry charges and to
protect the English troops. As soon as the stakes were in position the
longbowmen, on the command of their officers, let loose the first of
their deadly volleys of arrows. The English longbow was a
lethal weapon. An ordinary man could be trained to be a skilled archer
who was capable of shooting six carefully aimed arrows a minute. These
would wound at 400 yards, kill at 200 yards and penetrate armour at 100
yards. The archers were supplied with different arrowheads for
penetrating armour, killing men or disabling horses. The
French army was lined up in three ranks from the edge of one forest to
the other, and the men had little room to move. So closely packed were
the three ranks that their archers were having trouble firing and
loading their crossbows and the French cannons could not be used
effectively. Volleys of English arrows were falling on the front ranks
of the French and this prompted them to charge forwards. As the knights
(on horses) led the first charge the effect of the forests converging
started to tell. They were pushed closer and closer together and that
churned up the mud of the field until it soon became like a bog. This
slowed down the whole French force and the slippery mud caused the next
ranks to slip and fall. As the front ranks neared the English lines (no
longer charging at any real speed) volley after volley of precisely
aimed arrows stuck the leaders who were killed or dismounted.
The front ranks of men were slain and fell to the ground which slowed
up the horses in the next rank. The rear rank could not see what was
happening and pressed the whole army forwards, slowly, into the English
arrows. Those men who managed to reach the front had to climb over a
growing mountain of dead and dying men and horses which slowed them up
even more. The few men who did cross the mound of dead were slain as
they revealed themselves to the accurate English archers. The charge
had petered out and the surviving French were in total confusion so the
Archers put their bows over their shoulders and advanced with swords to
complete their work. Trying to save themselves from an ignominious
defeat the French sent in a second wave of troops which crushed and
trampled to death their wounded. Once again the English troops
slaughtered any that managed to pass the pile of dead and the French
finally withdrew. The English soldiers took some 1600 French
wounded and dazed men prisoner and sent them back behind the English
lines for ransom later. This would yield each man a significant amount
of money in bounty. Unfortunately the French peasants who had
turned out to watch the English being defeated grew angry and decided
that they too should share in the spoils of the battle. The fact that
they would be stripping their own countrymen of money and riches did
not upset them one bit! Taking advantage of the fact that the English
had not guarded the French prisoners very well, the peasants started to
loot and steal from the baggage train. The uniformed prisoners and the
looting peasants were mistaken for a French army attacking the rear of
the English lines with the result that Henry gave the order to kill the
prisoners to prevent them escaping and fighting. His guards refused
because of the loss of ransom if the prisoners were killed but then
carried out his orders. After threatening his own men with a few
hundred archers they commenced the slaughter of the prisoners. Once it
was realised that the 'attack' was the looting French peasants the
orders were given to stop the killing, but only a few of the most
valuable prisoners remained alive. The French commanders
were now aware not only that the battle was a disaster for them, but
they were becoming aware of just how great a disaster it was. No orders
were given to retreat as the French soldiers had already started to
slip away from the battle and then if became a full blown rout as they
ran from the battlefield. 
The
Aftermath The
figures for the final number of casualties vary greatly. Shakespeare
gave the number of English killed dead as "four nobles and 25 regular
troops". Other figures mention 500 - 1000 English dead, but historians
accept the real figure as being in the order of 100 to 200. French
losses are better documented. At the time it was estimated by the
French authorities that between 8000 and 11000 were slain. This
includes about 1500 slaughtered prisoners. Part of the
French way of life never survived this defeat because a whole
generation of French nobles were slain. There was hardly a single noble
family who did not lose men that day and many family lines were wiped
out forever. The English collected so much loot on the
battlefield that they could not carry or move it. In the end much of it
was destroyed in order to prevent it getting back to the French.
The victorious army returned to England and more English armies were
dispatched to France to replace them. Those Englishmen, including the
longbowmen, went on to win more battles until, eventually, the French
King, King Charles VI agreed to let Henry inherit France. Not only
that, but he let Henry marry his daughter.
Shakespeare’s Henry V contains perhaps the best known description of
the battle which forms a major part of the play. Shakespeare’s version
of Henry’s pre-battle oration is one of the most stirring passages of
English literature. |